Policies & Procedures

In a competitive job market compensation and benefits take on an even greater level of significance. Unfortunately, the management of such benefits can also take on an added level of complexity.

The HR Company takes the complexity back out. We take the guess-work out of decision making by surveying the marketplace and keeping you informed.

We take the headache out of administering compensation and benefits by providing you with a variety of specialised back-office services. These include everything from processing pension and medical plans to managing and organising your company’s Organisational Health Index.

Here is a list of some of the services we offer to assist companies with their compensation and benefits management:

 

•Pension/medical membership processing

•Salary survey, planning & administration

•Salary/Bonus/Stock system processing

•Company Car policy management

•Mortgage application processing

•Maternity/Parental Leave benefits

•Flexible benefits

•Advise on, manage and organise annual Benefits and Expo & Health Awareness Programme

•Manage & organise company OHI

•Manage Outplacement Programme

•Tailored generation of reports & statistics

 

If you require guidance or support with benefit and compensation administration then look no further than The HR Company.

 

We provide a virtual employment law service over the phone and on email.  It entails making sure your business is compliant at all times.  We issue contracts of employment, handbooks, handle disputes, issue warning letters and basically offer a 24/7 helpline. We provide an unlimited service with regard to any issues in the workplace.

 

We are a long established Irish owned ‘HR Compliance’ Company, specialising in Employment Law and Legislation, we are based in Sandyford, Dublin with 23 staff.

 

We support small to medium sized companies in ensuring that your business is compliant from an employee perspective, therefore keeping you legal. We protect you and act as your eyes and ears on all Irish Employment Law issues.

 

The Cost of the service is €99+vat per month up to 30 employees and thereafter €3.50 for each additional employee minimum subscription of 1 year.   

 

There is a once off set-up administration fee of €200 +vat.  This is normally issued via cheque.

 

In summary, we support associations by providing you with customised and personal advice on any Employment Law issues 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

 

·       We handle all Grievance Issues in the work place

·       We manage all work associated with reducing working hours and any redundancies

·       We interpret all employment legislation where we deliver all Disciplinary recommendations, we will even write the disciplinary letters for you. These will be customised, we do not work with samples or templates. What you will receive on email will be the final document, you will not have to make any edits or changes

·       We will guarantee you are NERA compliant

Did you know? - That NERA inspectors are currently carrying out investigations to ensure that businesses are compliant with employment law legislation and that labour inspectorates have the right to request access to employment records such as, Hours of Work, Public Holiday Benefits, Annual Leave, Wage Sheets and Legally Compliant Contracts. 

Non compliance can result in fines ranging from €650 to €1,900 depending on the offence with a proposal currently in place for the maximum fine to be increased to €5,000 and/or imprisonment of up to 12 months and summary conviction or a maximum fine of €250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to 5 years and indictment.  

·       We will answer any question of employee legislation ie what rights does an employee have under the Maternity leave act/Parental leave act/Force Majeure/Compassionate leave/Part-Time / Casual workers and their rights!

·       We will manage any conflict in the organisation

·       We manage Bullying & Harassment in the workplace

·       We handle all Performance Issues and provide recommendations on what to do.

·       Negotiation with Trade Unions

·       Dealing with the LRC (Labour Relations Commission)

·       We will issue all contracts of employment and email to you, these will be customised and again not samples.  Every time you hire new people, you just let us know and we will have a Contract of Employment for them within 24 hrs.

·       We will write an Employee Handbook specific to your business, we do not use ‘one suits all’

Your dedicated account manager is available to your for advice and support on all HR issues whenever you need to ask a question.

Why not get your HR documents audited by one of our specialists free of charge and avail of a complimentary 1:1 (no obligation) Irish Employment Legislation consultation at your premises?

In this extrememly litigious era where employees know their rights insulate your company and treat yourself to peace of mind by availing of our free consultation -

 

 

 

 

Please note all our legal documents ie Contracts of Employment and other documents are all copyright protected and will be issued in PDF format only

The issue of age discrimination has become a significant one in Ireland in this extremely litigious era – it is imperative that employers are very careful in all they say, write and do in relation to age if they aim to avoid a discrimination claim. 

Discrimination is defined as the treatment of one person in a less favourable way than another person in a comparable situation on any of the nine specific grounds. It covers not only current and past discrimination but also discrimination that may exist in the future or is imputed to a person.

The Employment Equality Acts 1998-2011 prohibit discrimination in employment based on a person’s age as well as eight other grounds (gender, civil status, family status, sexual orientation, religion, disability, race and membership of the Traveller community). The Equality Authority, in some instances, will provide assistance to individuals who feel as though they have been discriminated against in their employment.

The Equality Tribunal is charged with investigating alleged discrimination on any of the nine grounds and ensures the relevant employment legislation is implemented correctly. The Equality Tribunal can enforce a means of redress or compensation in favour of the employee.

Discrimination based on age commonly occurs at the recruitment stage and in the course of the interview and selection process. The Acts outlaw discrimination in job advertisements and therefore employers need to be extremely careful when drafting such advertisements. An employer cannot seek a “young and dynamic employee” as this excludes several candidates who are not “young” – all interested parties should have equal right to be considered for the role. Similarly, employers should not make it compulsory for applicants to provide their age or date of birth when applying for a job.

It is also frequent in the area of promotion or in redundancy scenarios. An employee cannot be made redundant in order to make way for a “younger” employee.

Employers are entitled to implement certain policies under the Acts, for instance, an employer may set a minimum age requirement (not more than 18 years of age) for potential applicants for a job. The employer can also set a compulsory retirement age but this must be clear and fair for all employees based on their role.

In relation to retirement ages an employer should have a policy in place that covers this. He or she should ensure that the compulsory retirement age is referred to in the contract of employment as well as including a very detailed description of the policy in the company handbook – employees should be required to confirm in writing that they have read and accept the employee handbook.

A Retirement Policy should, at a very minimum, confirm the age at which employees must retire. It should also include a timeline detailing what happens in the run up to the retirement date. For instance, when the employee should expect to be advised of their precise retirement date and details of who they should expect to receive this information from.

Some employers will provide that a member of the HR department meets the employee who is set to retire in order to discuss items like outstanding annual leave, handover procedures, return of company equipment, how any benefits or benefits-in-kind may be managed (a company car, for example, if applicable).

Some companies will also assist the employee who is retiring by providing a pre-retirement course in advance of their departure or by discussing pensions and other financial matters with the individual. It could benefit the employee to meet with a financial advisor in the run up to the employee’s retirement - this is something that the employer could provide. If the employee offers this the option to meet a financial advisor (or similar) it should be detailed in the employee handbook.

The effective management of the retirement process will support the employee in the final stages of their employment with the company and will protect the employer by enabling the appropriate transfer of valuable knowledge from the departing employee to the company.

 

 

Companies may offer a fixed-term contract to a person over the compulsory retirement age but there is no obligation on them to do so.

Often the Tribunal finds in favour of the employee in cases relating to discrimination in the workplace, however, one notable age related case was dismissed by the Equality Tribunal when evidence that the employer had an established policy with regard to retirement age and had included retirement age in the contract of employment was provided.

The relevant case decision number is DEC-E2012-086.

Mr. X argued that his former employer had discriminated against him on the basis of age when he was forced to retire at the age of 65. Mr. X had worked for his employer for more than 10 years prior to turning 65. Mr. X, along with his colleagues, were informed of his departure date via e-mail when an invitation to a social event to mark Mr. X’s retirement was sent out.

Mr. X did not want to retire and argued that he was being directly discriminated against on the basis of his age. The employer refuted Mr. X’s allegation and argued that the retirement age of 65 was a “clear term and condition of the contract of employment of employees and a long-standing custom and practice”.

Mr. X’s claim failed as the Tribunal found that his former employer had a “well established practice of retiring its employees” at the age of 65. In certain instances employees who were over 65 were re-engaged on fixed-term contracts for project purposes but that wasn’t the case in all circumstances and it was not the case with Mr. X.

It was an interesting determination from an employer perspective.

Lots of difficult situations present themselves for employers on a regular basis - The HR Company aims to assist employers with their challenging role by giving pratical advice on all HR related activities -

 

One of our consultants was asked a question by an employer about redundancy -

Unfortunately, with the recent economic climate, my business simply doesn't justify eleven employees anymore. Things have become very quiet for us and I am struggling to make ends meet. I feel I need to get down to approximately seven employees to ride-out the downturn. What is the process that I should follow in order to stay compliant in this situation? 

 

 

The HR Company advice: 

Many companies are finding themselves in similar situations in this economy. Initially, the owner should determine if this quiet period is one that is expected to be short term or longer term. If the quiet period is expected to be for a few weeks or months the owner should consider placing employees on reduced working hours or possibly laying off some staff for the short term.

Alternatively, if the business cannot sustain the number of employees they currently hold, then redundancies will need to be considered. All other avenues should be exhausted prior to making the decision to make positions redundant. There is a strict redundancy selection process that has to be followed when making job roles redundant. Remember that it is the role that is made redundant rather than the employee – One cannot make an employee redundant and then hire a replacement in their role the next day.

 

Common employer pitfall:

If a business does not engage with introducing any of these measures with employees in the correct way, the employee may leave the company (i.e. if on a short working week or on lay-off) and claim Constructive Dismissal which could see the employee awarded a large sum. If the correct redundancy process is not followed a former employee may make a claim of Unfair Dismissal or Unfair Selection for Redundancy which can run to high costs for your business in the long run.

 

 

The Protected Disclosure Bill 2013 was published on July 3^rd 2013 by Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, Brendan Howlin, T.D. The Bill is to establish a comprehensive legislative framework protecting whistleblowers in all industries in Ireland. The purpose of the legislation is to protect workers who raise concerns regarding wrongdoing (or potential wrongdoing) that they have become aware of in the workplace. The Bill will offer significant employment and other protections to whistleblowers if they suffer any penalties at the hands of their employer for coming forward with information of wrongdoing in the workplace.   The legislation, which is due to be enacted in the autumn, closely reflects best practices in whistleblowing protection in developed nations around the world. According to Minister Howlin the Bill “should instil all workers with confidence that should they ever need to take that decisive step and speak-up on concerns that they have about possible misconduct in the workplace, they will find that society values their actions as entirely legitimate, appropriate and in the public interest”. Some key elements included in the Bill are as follows: Compensation of up to a maximum of five years remuneration can be awarded in the case of an unfair dismissal that came about as a result of making a protected disclosure. This would be a massive step forward in Ireland’s attempt to match the standards set by other established nations. It is important to note that limitations relating to the length of service that usually apply in the case of Unfair Dismissals are set aside in the case of protected disclosures. As a result of this Bill whistleblowers will benefit from civil immunity from actions for damages and a qualified privilege under defamation law. The legislation provides a number of disclosure channels for potential whistleblowers and stresses that the disclosure, rather than the whistleblower, should be the focus of the attention. Protections for the whistleblower remain in place even where the information disclosed does not reveal any wrongdoing when examined. Deliberate false reporting, however, will not be protected. These measures, when enacted, should encourage more people to come forward, and feel comfortable doing so, when they become aware of (or suspect) any criminal activity, misconduct or wrongdoing in the workplace.

Effective from 1st July 2013, anyone who has not yet paid, or started to pay, their applicable local property tax (LPT) will have the option to have it deducted from their payroll (or occupational pension) available to them. Those who fail to submit their LPT return or fail to meet the relevant payment obligations will have mandatory deduction at source from salary or pension imposed.

 

Employers and occupational pension providers alike will be obliged to ensure this facility is available to employees from next month.
If property owners are availing of the option to have their applicable LPT deducted at source Revenue will notify the employer/ pension provider via the P2C (employer copy of the tax credit certificate in respect of the individual employee).

The relevant sum is to be deducted from the employee’s net pay.
The employer is to commence deducting the LPT once he or she has received the relevant P2C (but not prior to July 1^st 2013). The P2Cs are due to be issued to employers by mid June. The LPT to be deducted should be illustrated at the bottom of the P2C. The deductions are to be made, on a consistent basis only, over the 6 month period between July and December 2013. If the employee is paid weekly then the LPT deduction should be made weekly and if the employee is paid monthly then the deduction should be applied monthly.

For example if the LPT to be deducted is €300 then an employee who is paid weekly will see €300/26=€11.538 deducted from their weekly net salary (Any rounding should be in favour of the employee) - If an employee owing €300 is paid monthly then he or she is due to pay €300/6=€50 on a monthly basis.  Any refunds of LPT will be dealt with by Revenue – Employers are not to make any refunds of this kind.

 

If the employer receives the P2C detailing LPT after the July payroll has run then the total LPT should be deducted from August through December - the remaining 5 month period.

 

Employers will have to keep a record of the applicable LPT that they deduct for Revenue and will be required to account for the figures on the Forms P30 and P35 in respect of the employees concerned. The employer will also have to record the appropriate LPT data for employees on their payslips as well as P60’s and P45s.

Where there is a Court Order on file prior to the issuance of the P2C this will take precedence over the LPT deduction. However, if the P2C is issued prior to a Court Order being made then the LPT deduction will preside. Where the Court Order and P2C are issued or made effective from the same date the Court Order takes precedence. The LPT payment, however, takes precedence over all non-statutory deductions.

The Employer/Pension provider cannot take an instruction from the employee to stop deducting LPT from his or her salary – the employer is obliged to deduct the applicable LPT until the P2C shows that no further payment is due. If an employee would like to pay the relevant tax via a different method he or she should contact the LPT Branch and make these arrangements – then the employer will be issued with an updated P2C telling them to stop the deduction from pay/pension. Similarly if the employee feels as though there is a discrepancy in the amount of LPT they are being charged he or she should discuss this with the LPT Branch and if an adjustment needs to be made to the P2C then a revised directive will be issued to the employer.

 

According to Revenue “Where there are shortfalls due to insufficient net salary in a particular pay period(s) the employer should adjust the amount of LPT to be deducted per pay period (for the remaining pay periods in the year) to ensure the full amount of LPT is collected by the end of the year. Once this is done, the employer will not be required to notify Revenue about the shortfall. However, employers must notify Revenue in writing (e.g. by Secure Email to employersLPT@revenue.ie) where there will be insufficient income to satisfy the employee’s full LPT liability for the year, based on the expected income for the employee.”

Revenue has established a helpline for employers and pension providers alike to assist with their queries on how this LPT deduction at source will operate.

The Employer Helpline is 1890 25 45 65.

 

Effective 1^stFebruary 2014 the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) will standardise the processing of electronic payments in the Euro currency. The objective of SEPA is to make payments via credit transfer or debit card within the area fast, safe and efficient. The aim is that electronic cross-border payments are due to become as simple as paying with cash.

The scheme was established to overcome the technical, legal and market obstacles that exist from before the changeover to the Euro currency. The goal is to create a single market for Euro-denominated retail payments. SEPA will enable users to make cashless payments to payees anywhere within the SEPA zone using a single payment account and a single set of payment instructions.

This will allow for the easy movement of food, services and capital throughout the region. What this means is that citizens cannot only live and work anywhere in the area, but can also benefit from competitively priced goods and services, throughout the region.

The Euro currency came into effect in 1999 as an accounting currency (cash and coins were first circulated in the initial Euro currency countries in 2002). The long-term plan has always been to move away from the fragmented national payment markets and to move towards a European Union wide market that is more efficient.

SEPA will impact all citizens operating/living within its boundaries that hold a payment bank account. Those operating in participating countries will soon be able to make and receive Euro-denominated payments with a standard set of terms and conditions – regardless of whether the payments are made within or across national borders.

People will not be obliged to maintain bank accounts in any one particular country in the region to make or receive payments. An account anywhere in SEPA will be able to make or receive a Euro-denominated electronic transaction anywhere else in SEPA with ease. An Irish person living in France will not have to set-up an account in the host country to pay utilities and rent and so on electronically (as has been the case). SEPA will make life easier in this respect – People will no longer be constrained by national borders for banking and will instead be able to bank wherever suits them within the SEPA zone.

New business rules will be implemented with regard to payments. Along with this a set of common standards and requirements for issuing and executing electronic payment instructions in all participating regions will be introduced.

From 1^st February 2014 it will be compulsory for countries to withdraw existing “national only” payment standards/systems and it will be mandatory for members to migrate all electronic payments to the SEPA standards.

SEPA is being rolled out in thousands of banks in the countries and regions included in the scheme - the 27 European Union members (28 with the inclusion of Croatia in July 2013) as well as Norway, Monaco, Switzerland, Iceland and Liechtenstein. SEPA in Ireland is being overseen by the National Payments Plan (NPP) Steering Committee along with a National Payments Plan sub group which consists of representatives of the Central Bank of Ireland, Government, banks, businesses and consumers.

The European Union Commission has made SEPA migration mandatory and businesses, regardless of size, will have to make adjustments to their processes to ensure they comply with SEPA on credit transfers and direct debit payments – A lot of engagement is required with banks and advisors prior to the February 1^st 2014 deadline.

For SEPA to succeed it will require active participation from these new payment scheme users – namely public administrators, companies and consumers alike. SEPA will affect the vast majority of people and should not be overlooked. Timely migration is recommended – the deadline is quickly approaching.

When SEPA is effective the cost associated with making a payment outside of your own nation should not be any more than within your own national borders – this will be a huge benefit to both consumers and companies.

It is important to note that payments made in a currency other than Euro and to/from non SEPA countries may still attract foreign exchange charges and/or transaction fees.

Those who currently have direct debits leaving their accounts should experience a seamless transition. However, those collecting payments (the payees) of the direct debits will need to make changes to their internal systems. This is of particular importance for companies.

SEPA will have the biggest impact on companies as the standardised payment infrastructure should open up new possibilities to expand business beyond country borders. Common standards, faster settlements and simplified processing will improve cash flow, reduce costs and facilitate access to new markets further afield than before.

Like consumers businesses will need to use Bank Identifier Codes (BIC) and International Bank Account Numbers (IBAN) to identify their bank and account rather than the current identifiers (National Sort Codes and account numbers). Companies should obtain all relevant details on SEPA standards from their banks – the advice is to act quickly and to make the relevant modifications to existing systems or develop new ones without delay. Information technology system providers should be consulted from the outset as the migration could significantly impact these systems.

It is essential for companies to ensure they are informed on all relevant matters here.

 

 

 

 

 

Employees spend a good portion of their waking hours in the working environment (often with people who share similar interests to themselves) – given this it isn’t a surprise that relationships regularly develop in the workplace.

How employers deal with these relationships is the important element here. Risks for both the employer and the employees exist in these scenarios.

Some workplace relationships turn into long-term, healthy relationships where the couple are very happy with each other. However, often the situation doesn’t end on such a positive note and it can, in certain instances, create a very awkward working environment for the individuals involved as well as other members of the department who are present in the aftermath.

 

Office relationships can, at times, be a very positive thing for a business – it can encourage high levels of morale in the workplace and that, in turn, can improve standards of productivity and creativity. Unfortunately, however, workplace relationships can also have negative effects. Employee attention could be focused on the relationship as opposed to the duties of the role and this could lead to a decline in productivity or performance which, subsequently, could threaten the company’s success.

Banning relationships between colleagues isn’t the best route to take for a number of reasons (it isn’t really enforceable), however, it is absolutely essential that employers put certain policies in place in order to avoid what could result in a very awkward conclusion.

Clear rules should be devised for two employees who wish to engage in a mutual relationship. To ensure that your company avoids any hints of sexual harassment it is essential to put clear and concise guidelines in place (employers in Ireland are actually obliged to have policies and procedures on bullying and harassment in place).

It might be a good idea to have a rule that restricts employees from having a relationship with a superior in their own department, for instance, stressing that the rule is the same for all and that its function is to protect employees against sexual harassment and favouritism.

Restricting certain behaviour is absolutely paramount as inappropriate behaviour, such as public displays of affection, in the workplace is not acceptable and can compromise the internal culture of the company. Implementing strict rules that leave no room for ambiguity is advisable.

Dignity in the workplace is the right of every employee. It is imperative that you take the dignity at work policy very seriously to protect yourself, as an employer, from a lawsuit and to protect your employees at the same time.  The Employment Equality Acts 1998-2011 mean that employers are liable for harassment in the workplace. Harassment is defined as any form of unwelcome/unwanted conduct relating to any of the discriminatory grounds – gender, civil status, family status, sexual orientation, age, disability, race, religious belief and membership of the Traveller community.

Sexual harassment comes under the bullying and harassment umbrella and includes any act of unwanted verbal, non-verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Sexual harassment violates a person’s dignity by creating an intimidating, hostile or humiliating environment for the person. 

It is crucial for employers to be aware that they may be held legally responsible/liable for the harassment or bullying that occurs in the workplace – even where they are not aware that this is taking place.

Employers should include an acceptable grievance or complaints outline in the dignity at work policy so that employees are not only aware of what is expected of them but what happens when they breach the policy too.

 

 

As you are probably aware three crèches between Dublin and Wicklow have come under intense scrutiny in recent days after it came to light that young children under their care were allegedly subjected to inappropriate and unacceptable treatment by staff at the childcare and early learning facilities in Stepaside, Malahide and Rathnew.

An RTÉ researcher, posing as a childcare worker, uncovered the substandard care while working at the facilities. The undercover researcher’s disturbing findings included video footage illustrating manhandling of infants and young children. The report, “A Breach of Trust”, was aired on Prime Time Investigates yesterday (Tuesday 28^th May 2013). The claims are currently being investigated by An Garda Síochána and the Childcare and Family Services unit of the HSE.

While the Prime Time Investigates programme focused heavily on three specific facilities it also highlighted failures in the entire childcare industry in Ireland. The researchers acquired a HSE inspection report that showed that a staggering 75% of Irish childcare facilities were in breach of regulations in 2012.

Minister for Children, Frances Fitzgerald, said that the HSE inspection reports into childcare facilities will be published online in the next few weeks.

Understandably, these statistics have caused uproar and have opened up a huge debate on childcare standards in Ireland. Many parents have been very upset by the recent revelations of breaches in child protection regulations. The poor practices exposed in certain crèches are likely to negatively affect the opinion held by many with regard to childcare facilities in Ireland.

These revelations will bring about intense scrutiny from parents of children in crèches all around the country. In order to protect their reputation it is absolutely vital that management take the time to ensure that all employees in crèches and childcare facilities in general are fully qualified for the roles in which they have been hired.

It is imperative that all employees working with children are vetted thoroughly and that all relevant paperwork is in place.

 

The HSE report from 2012 highlighted serious policy breaches and failures on numerous grounds like the child-carer ratio. It is imperative that employers seek advice from Employment Legislation experts if they need clarification on policies and procedures that they are required to have in place or if they need help in determining whether or not they have the appropriate paperwork on file. It is essential that all facilities are adequately staffed and that management take the necessary precautions to ensure a high standard of protection and care for children at all times.

One suggestion perhaps might be to install a CCTV system to monitor the interaction between employees and children – before doing so, however, a CCTV policy is required – again, it is essential to seek advice from the appropriate body if you are considering such a course of action.

Reports suggest that multiple employees have been suspended and that at least one employee has been dismissed by the crèches named in the report pending the conclusion of the Garda, HSE and internal inquiries.

Employers need to remember that, to avoid any risk of exposure, it is absolutely imperative to follow approved disciplinary procedures prior to disciplining employees. Regardless of the severity of the situation there are steps that need to be followed in order to ensure employers remain compliant with all Irish Employment Legislation. It is vital to follow procedures that are in line with the Labour Court recommendations to insulate your company against the risk of a future claim or fine. To avoid jeopardising the process contact an Employment Law expert prior to initiating any disciplinary action and arm yourself with the appropriate guidance.

 

 

Employee who was dismissed while on sick leave (for allegedly failing to discharge his duties as head chef and because of his unacceptable behaviour over a number of months) is awarded a sum close to €18,000 by the Employment Appeals Tribunal under the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 and 2007, the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Acts, 1997 to 2005 and the Organization of Working Time Act, 1997.

According to the Employer the Employee in question allegedly displayed aggressive behaviour and appeared for work under the influence of drink. Reports of bullying of colleagues and name calling were filed with the Employer along with incidents of racism and other insults (for instance, calling a kitchen porter “stupid”, “slow” and “a druggie”). The Employee was also accused of throwing a knife at another member of staff - Matters the Employee refutes.

 

The Employee’s performance was called into question on a number of occasions prior to his dismissal – his failure to have adequate staffing and stock were criticized. A lack of communication and flexibility, in particular in relation to changing his time-off (for example, refusing to come to work on Good Friday when the Munster rugby team was playing) was outlined in an “Official Written Warning” on the 6^th of April (the second letter of its kind).

On the 7^th of April a dispute arose as to whether the Employee in question arrived for work “drunk”. He was instructed to get a blood test by his Employer. The Employee left the premises and sent a text message explaining that he would be on sick leave for the remainder of the week. Over the next few weeks the Employee sent numerous medical certificates indicating that he was suffering from an ulcer (the Employer was aware of this ulcer from early on in the employment).

On receipt of the “Official Written Warning” dated 6^th April (mentioned above) the Employee’s trade union sought a meeting with the Employer as the trade union maintained that the warnings had been issued “unfairly without any consultation or trade union representation”. This meeting was held on the 20^th of April in the hopes that issues between the Employer and Employee (who had previously been friends) could be resolved, however, the Employee’s unresponsiveness dissatisfied the Employer and he undertook to consult with his legal team. The Employee believed that the Employer wanted to replace him as he had advertised for a head chef the previous day (April 19^th).

On the 26^th of April the Employee enquired as to when he should return to work and the Employer replied telling the Employee to start back the following week (May 3^rd) but when the expected return date arrived the Employee again produced a medical certificate. Two days later the Employer instructed the Employee to post medical certificates and not to attend the premises, except to return keys, until the Employer had heard from his legal team.

When the Employee furnished medical certificates to cover him for the entire month the Employer wrote to the Employee dismissing him for failure to heed the warnings regarding his behaviour and for arriving to work under the influence of drink as well as throwing a knife at another staff member. 

The Employee believed the disciplinary action was taken against him as a result of a complaint that he had made to the National Employment Rights Authority (NERA) a few months prior to the dismissal.

The Employee was dismissed while on sick leave and the Employment Appeals Tribunal found that, based on the medical certificates and an endoscopist’s letter, the Employee had genuine reason for his absence. The Tribunal found that the procedures used by the Employer in dismissing the Employee were “flawed” and “deficient” because neither of the “official warnings” issued to the Employee put him on notice that his job was in jeopardy.

The Tribunal found that the Employer had not investigated the knife allegation in a “fair” manner. The Employee was dismissed without the benefit of a disciplinary hearing and without being afforded the opportunity to respond to the allegations made against him. In addition the Tribunal found that the Employee was not afforded an adequate opportunity to improve between his warning letter and his dismissal (as he was on sick leave during that period).

The Employee was awarded €14,500 under the Unfair Dismissals Acts, 1977 to 2007, €1,538 (being the equivalent to two weeks’ pay) under the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Acts, 1973 to 2005 and €1,691.80 (being the equivalent of 11 days annual leave) under the Organisation of Working Time Act, 1997.

In total the sum awarded to the Employee by the Tribunal was €17,729.80.

You might ask how this Employee received such a substantial award given his alleged appalling performance in the workplace...... The Employer failed to follow the correct process when disciplining, and then dismissing, the Employee and therefore left himself open to a claim under the Acts.

This was a very costly mistake on the part of the Employer and one that could easily finish a small business.

This example, along with thousands more, reiterates the significance of complying with Irish Employment Legislation and observing appropriate disciplinary procedures in order to insulate your company from the risk of a claim.

 

 

Published on Employment Appeals Tribunal Website – 29^th May 2013 – Sealed with the Seal of the Employment Appeals Tribunal. 

Source:

http://www.eatribunal.ie/determinationAttachments/indexedLiveDocs/c5e8f31a-cc9b-4ee6-8d59-1d9d7e1059ee.pdf