All you need to know about HR!
Supporting Business Owners, Directors and HR Professionals with the latest in HR trends and news.
August 2017
Employer Responsibilities – Contracts of Employment
Employers are legally obliged to provide workers with a written statement of the employment agreement between the two parties (the contract) within two months of the employee commencing employment.
Having a contract in place can offer protection to the Company in the event of a dispute or issue arising. This document can help to safeguard the Company in the event of employee litigation or Labour Court hearings.
Reasons why you, as an Employer, need to issue a Contract of Employment:
-
It outlines the requirements of the position and the conditions the person is meant to work against.
-
It addresses the legal requirements against which all employees are protected today.
-
In the event of poor performance the employer can refer to the contract and all conditions contained therein, and manage the employee against such conditions.
-
The use of probationary periods is fundamental for all new employees.
An example of what an employee’s rights are in the event of not having a contract in place:
If the employer fails to give written details of the terms of employment, the employee can bring a complaint to a Rights Commissioner. The employee must make the complaint when in employment or within 6 months of leaving employment.
Legal Requirements:
-
The Terms of Employment (Information) Acts 1994 and 2001 provide that an employer is obliged to provide an employee with a written statement of terms of employment within the first two months of the commencement of employment.
The statement of terms must include the following information:
- (a) the full name of employer and employee
- (b) the address of the employer
- (c) the place of work
- (d) the title of job or nature of work
- (e) the date of commencement of employment
- (f) in the case of a temporary contract of employment, the expected duration of the contract or, if the contract of employment is for a fixed term, the date on which the contract expires,
- (g) the rate of pay or method of calculation of pay and the pay reference period for the purposes of the National Minium Wage Act, 2000
- (h) that the employee may, under section 23 of the National Minimum Wage Act, 2000, request from the employer a written statement of the employee’s average hourly rate of pay for any pay reference period as provided in that section.
- (i) pay intervals
- (j) the terms of conditions relating to hours of work (including information on overtime and entitlements to rest breaks and rest periods as per the Organisation of Working Time Act)
- (k) terms or conditions relating to paid leave (other than sick leave)
- (l) terms and conditions relating to sick/injury leave and sick pay and pensions and pension schemes
- (m) notice which the employee is entitled to receive and obliged to give
- (n) reference to any collective agreements which directly affect the terms and conditions of the employee’s employment.
In the case of the particulars noted at (g) (h) (i) (j) (k), (l) and (m) above, the employer, as an alternative to providing all the details in the statement, may use the statement to refer the employee to certain other documents containing the particulars, provided such documents are reasonably accessible to the employee in his/her employment.
The statement of terms must indicate the reference period being used by the employer for the purposes of the calculation of the employee's entitlements under the Minimum Wage Act, 2000. (Under that Act the employer may calculate the employee's minimum wage entitlement over a reference period that is no less than one week and no greater than one month).
The statement of terms must also inform the employee that he/she has the right to ask the employer for a written statement of his/her average hourly rate of pay for any reference period (except the current reference period) in the 12 months prior to the date of the employee’s request.
An Employee Working Abroad is also entitled to details of the following:
-
The period of employment outside the State
-
The currency in which they will be paid
-
Any other benefits-in-kind or cash that will be provided
-
The terms and conditions applicable on the employee's return home
Here are examples of some further terms and conditions of employment that are not required by law but are highly recommended:
-
Probationary Period and Probation Policy
-
Hours of work / additional hours / overtime / shift liability / weekend liability / night work liability / public holiday liability
-
Performance related bonuses
-
Absence Management
-
Medical examination
-
Holidays, public holidays, all other forms of leave
-
Grievance and Disciplinary Procedures
-
Confidentiality
-
Company Property
-
Phone and Mobile Phone Usage
-
Right to Inspect / Search
-
Drugs & Alcohol Policy / Right to Test for Intoxicants
-
Retirement
-
Company Rules and Regulations
-
Bullying and Harassment / Respect and Dignity at Work
-
Internet, Email & Social Media Usage
-
Use of Company Vehicles
-
Suspension without pay
-
Break and rest periods / exemption provision for employer for recording breaks
-
Return of company property
Have you heard of NERA?
The National Employment Rights Authority (NERA) delivers unprejudiced information on employment rights legislation to employers and employees in Ireland. NERA is charged with monitoring the employment rights of employees within the country. NERA inspectors perform various checks around the country and investigate suspected breaches of employment rights – it is important to bear in mind that a significant number of these inspection are unannounced. If NERA finds that an employer is not complying with employment rights legislation inspectors will seek reparation from the employer on behalf of the employee. In certain circumstances prosecutions against the employer may result.
NERA has the power to chase awards made by the Labour Court, the Rights Commissioner or the Employment Appeals Tribunal.
In order to pass a NERA inspection; employers must have provided their employees with clarity on the terms and conditions of their employment.
July 2017
Drugs and Alcohol Policy in the Workplace
Employees attending for work under the influence of intoxicants
It […]
GDPR Regulation (EU) 2016/679
REGULATION (EU) 2016/679 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND […]
Part 3 – GDPR Preparation and Record Keeping
GDPR Preparation and Record Keeping
Previously we mentioned that […]
Part 2 – Key Impacts of GDPR
Key Impacts of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Part 1 – GDPR Introduction
An Introduction to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
HR’s Role in Cybersecurity
HR’s Role in Protecting Against Cyber Attacks
There was widespread […]
June 2017
Minor and Gross Misconduct Procedures
Proper conduct and professional behaviour in the workplace is essential to ensure the efficient operation of a Company on a daily basis. Employers need to define unacceptable conduct so that employees can differentiate between appropriate and inappropriate behaviour/actions.
The repercussions for breach of the behavioural policies or rules within an organisation should be clarified for all employees as it is very important to make them aware that their actions can lead to the disciplinary procedures being invoked. In severe cases misconduct in the workplace can lead to dismissal. There are two levels of misconduct – minor and gross. Minor instances of misconduct should initially result in informal advice being given by the Manager without having to resort to disciplinary action – if this approach proves unsuccessful then leaning on the formal disciplinary procedure may be required.- Examples of minor misconduct include:
- Persistent lateness or absenteeism
- Unsatisfactory standards of work or poor productivity
- Disruption of other employees
- Abusive language
- Unauthorised use of property or negligent damage/loss of property
- Failure to abide by Company dress code or Health and Safety procedures
- Sleeping while on duty
- Sexual harassment
- Making false allegations of personal injury/accidents in the workplace
- Gross indecent or immoral behaviour, deliberate discrimination or serious acts of harassment
- Deliberate fraud – e.g. falsification of records in respect of the individual or another employee or deliberate misrepresentation
- Smoking in breach of the Company policy
- Endangering others through fighting/physical assault or abuse
- Incapacity at work due to the use of intoxicants or drugs
- Possession, supply or use of illicit drugs
- Deliberate failure to carry out instructions, deliberate damage to Company policy/deliberate poor work performance
- Breach of code of professional conduct
- Providing confidential Company information to competitors or unauthorised bodies
- Rudeness towards clients and objectionable behaviour – neglect of duties that could result in harm to clients
- The taking of any property/money owned by colleagues or the Company without authorisation
- Arriving to work under the influence of alcohol where carrying out duties may be hindered
- Unauthorised use of Company property, facilities, or resources. Selling, attempting to sell or promoting the sale of non-Company merchandise while on Company premises.
January 2017
Long Term Illness and Disability
The recent case of ‘Arravasc Limited v Gerard Cahill’ has […]
June 2016
Channel Islands Transgender case a ‘warning’ to others.
A transgender woman has won a case of direct and […]
June 2015
Jobseekers Increasingly Consider Employer Brand Before Applying
According to recent reports, one in […]
Stress in Ireland
Introduction: Stress in the Workplace
One growing area in […]
Receptionist awarded €63K by Maternity leave discrimination
€63,000 has been awarded to a receptionist by The Equality Tribunal after it found she was discriminated against on the grounds of gender and race, and subsequently victimised. Sylwia Wach, a Polish receptionist began working at the Waterford Travelodge in 2007 where she was initially employed as an accommodation assistant before becoming a receptionist one year later. Ms Wach went on maternity leave on 23rd March 2011 before returning on 21st September 2011. On her return from maternity leave, Ms. Wach found her hours reduced, and also found that the company brought in a staff member from Cork to do shifts when Ms. Wach was available. Her manager allegedly expressed annoyance when he learned that she had raised this matter with their HR manager. He further stated that Ms. Wach’s contract was only for 24 hours, and that therefore, that was all she was entitled to. Ms. Wach outlined that those 24 hours were “minimum hours”, and that, on agreement with the previous manager, she had been working full time for the last three years. Her HR manager also accused her of not having sufficient English to work the job.
Ms Wach sent a written complaint about all the matters to her manager in October 2011 and as a result, a meeting was held in November 2011. Ms. Wach told the tribunal that following the complaint, her manager allegedly threatened to look through CCTV footage for any possible wrongdoing by her, where she was accused of selling alcohol to non-residents. Equality Officer Stephen Bonnlander outlined that he was satisfied Ms. Wach was fluent in both written and spoken English and that Ms. Wach's manager was "determined to make life difficult for her". In his judgement Mr. Bonnlander said:“I find that the complainant is entitled to succeed in her complaint of discrimination on the ground of gender, with regard to her conditions of employment. I do not accept the complainant’s manager’s statement with regard to the complainant’s proficiency in English, and therefore do not accept his reason for not assigning her day shifts, I find that the complainant is also entitled to succeed on her complaint of discrimination in her terms and conditions on the ground of race.”In accordance with Section 82 of the Acts, Mr Bonnlander ordered that Travelodge pay the Ms. Wach: (i) € 21,000 which equals one year’s salary for the complainant according to her P60 form for 2010 in compensation for the effects of discrimination and (ii) € 42,000 or the equivalent of two year’s salary in compensation for the effects of victimisation. This reflects the seriousness of the finding that the complainant found herself immediately threatened with false disciplinary charges when she exercised her right of complaint under the respondent’s own policies. He also said that the awards were in compensation for the distress suffered by the complainant and are not in the nature of pay and therefore not subject to tax. Do you want to protect your business with Ireland's leading HR and Employment Law experts ? If so, please feel free to contact The HR Company on 01 2911870.
Ireland’s Whistleblowing Act
The Protected Disclosures Act, 2014 is now in effect. The Protected Disclosure Bill 2013, commonly known as the ‘Whistleblowers Bill’ was published on July 3rd 2013 by the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform, Brendan Howlin, T.D. The Bill was drafted to establish a comprehensive legislative framework protecting whistle-blowers in all industries in Ireland. The Bill recently passed through the Oireachtas and Minister Howlin announced the commencement of the Protected Disclosures Act, 2014 today. The purpose of this Act is to protect workers who raise concerns regarding wrongdoing (or potential wrongdoing) that they have become aware of one way or another in the workplace. The Act offers significant employment and other protections to whistle-blowers if they suffer any penalties at the hands of their employer for coming forward with information of wrongdoing in their place of work. The Protected Disclosures Act, 2014 closely reflects best practices in whistle-blowing protection in developed nations around the world. Minister Howlin said that the Act “sends out a very clear message that whistleblowers’ concerns must be listened to and acted on and those who make such reports should not be penalised for doing so.” The Minister wanted to “instil all workers with confidence that should they ever need to take that decisive step and speak-up on concerns that they have about possible misconduct in the workplace, they will find that society values their actions as entirely legitimate, appropriate and in the public interest”. Some key elements included in the Bill are as follows: Compensation of up to a maximum of five years remuneration can be awarded in the case of an Unfair Dismissal that came about as a result of making a protected disclosure. This is a massive step forward in Ireland’s attempt to match the standards set by other established nations. The Act also provides for interim relief if an employee is dismissed for making a protected disclosure. *It is important to note that limitations relating to the length of service that usually apply in Unfair Dismissals cases are set aside in instances of protected disclosures. As a result of this Act, whistle-blowers will benefit from civil immunity from actions for damages and a qualified privilege under defamation law. The legislation provides a number of disclosure channels for potential whistle-blowers and stresses that the disclosure, rather than the whistle-blower, should be the focus of the attention. The Act provides strong protections against the disclosure of a whistle-blower's identity. Protections for the whistle-blower remain in place even where the information disclosed does not reveal any wrongdoing when examined. Deliberate false reporting, however, is not be protected. These measures should encourage more people to come forward, and feel comfortable doing so, when they become aware of (or suspect) any criminal activity, misconduct or wrongdoing in the workplace. What should employers do? As it applies to all employees in Ireland including contractors, agency workers, Gardaí and members of the defence forces; all employers should establish and clearly communicate a comprehensive ‘whistleblowing’ policy to ensure that staff are aware of and understand the provisions of the Protected Disclosures Act, 2014. It is important that cultural issues and negative connotations surrounding whistle-blowing are addressed within companies to ensure that employees adhere to the appropriate whistleblowing guidelines.
Paris-to-Nice Cycle 2014
Last update: 30/09/2014 @ 10:11
The Final Update - Mission Accomplished
So after 6 roller coaster days, I am pleased to say that we finally made it to Nice safe and well. I would like to express my sincere thanks and gratitude to everyone for their support over the last few months. Between us we've raised over €11k for Special Olympics Ireland and we really couldn't have done any of this without your support. For those of you that are interested I've included some photo's of the event above. Thanks again, Philip. [divider]Stage 4 - Carpentras to Aix [105KM]
Some photos from yesterdays cycle to Aix. The group are now about to depart on the second last stage of their cycle which will bring them from Aix to Maxime (128 KM). We understand that it is getting progressively harder as the trip goes on with the elevation gain increasing from 547m to 1574m.[divider]
Stage 3 - Logis to Carpentras [90KM]
Slightly later than scheduled, the group set off on their way to Carpentras just after 12.00pm this afternoon. The cycle took them through the lavender fields in the region via the village of Grignan which hosts a stunning Renaissance Castle. The group are expected to finish todays cycle in the next hour which will see them reach the half way point of the challenge. [divider]Stage 2 - Montargis to Nevers [143KM]
The group have now completed Stage two of their cycle to Nice. They are currently in the town of Nevers in central France. Today they left Montargis and travelled 143km to Nevers where they arrived at around 16:45. Tomorrow they will leave to cycle to Carpentras on stage 3 of the cycle. Two cyclist have been injured in the last 48 hours which sadly means they will be unable to complete the challenge. Check back again tomorrow for further updates and thanks again for all your support. [divider]The HR Company Proudly Supporting Special Olympics Ireland
The HR Company has teamed up with Sigmar Recruitment in support of Special Olympics Ireland. This year's event 'Paris2Nice' is just about to get underway with both Managing Directors of The HR Company and Sigmar joining an additional 93 cyclists as they make their way to Paris for the start of the 700 mile cycle. The first stage of the of cycle which commences tomorrow morning Saturday 20th September 2014, will see the group travel 128km from Paris to Montargis.Since 2011 Paris2Nice has raised €1.25m for a number of different charities. Paris2Nice is a central coordination hub, which in 2014 is supporting 95 riders to raise funds for 18 charities. The cycle will take place from 20th-25th September and the target for this year is €1,000,000!
Philip and Adie would like to pay a special thank you to everyone who has supported them over the last 9 months or contributed to this very worthy cause.
You can continue to contribute to this cause with all funds raised going directly to the charity.
Please note Philip and Adie will be paying for the cost of the trip independently of the fundraising, so be rest assured your donation will make a difference to those who need it.